What’s in a definition? Not a lot I’d suggest. Tim Crackanthorp MP, Labor member for Newcastle bravely moved an amendment to the ALP’s policy at their NSW weekend conference calling for clarity on funding categories.
Really? From the man who has probably done more to block, delay, obfuscate, undermine and misrepresent the $650 million investment in and renewal of Newcastle in a generation.
Definitions and categorisations matter if you are bereft of ideas and vision. Definitions matter if you think the NSW Government would return to the bad old days of not spending a razoo in Newcastle as Labor did in its 16 years in office.
Definitions count if you lack self belief and don’t think your city or electorate can put up sound business cases for productive infrastructure. Some would say definitions are important because it is easier than doing the comprehensive planning; prioritisation of infrastructure; calculating costs and benefits; making the case to Infrastructure NSW and Treasury and building broad support.
The NSW Liberal Government confirmed it has $87.5 Billion of infrastructure planned for the next four years. Newcastle and the Hunter will be sharing in that because the projects are needed, planned and backed by a Government that believes in the region. Not because of any definition or category. This figure doesn’t include a share of the $4.1Billion windfall from the sale of the State’s share of Snowy Hydro. The Premier and Deputy Premier have directed those funds should be directed to the regions. My advice from Treasury is no worthwhile, productive project should be excluded from consideration just because it touches on an excluded metro LGA. Inevitably major infrastructure projects have a large footprint and cross over multiple LGAs.
The Berejiklian Government is spending about twice as much on infrastructure as the previous Labor Government. Health Infrastructure told me their annual budget was just over $300million in 2012. Now it is more than $2Billion each year. Building a new Maitland Hospital was not possible under Labor simply because they didn’t have the funds.
I’d suggest Mr Crackanthorp MP and Labor focus less on definitions, categories and whinging and more on identifying well developed infrastructure proposals with solid business cases. When Newcastle is revitalised with modern health, education, urban , justice and transport infrastructure, who honestly cares about its category.
Scot MacDonald MLC